Most sites don't have a content problem, they have a shape problem. Pages nothing links to. Three routes to the same service, competing with each other. A hierarchy that made sense when there were six pages and stopped making sense at sixty. Tell us your domain and someone here will map how your site is actually put together, then email you where the structure is costing you.
That's the only required field, plus an email so we know where to send the findings. If there's a section you already suspect is a mess, tell us in the optional box.
Not a crawler. Someone at LATYNEX works through your site by hand — how it's organised, what links to what, which pages are stranded, where the same thing exists in three places — because the useful question isn't "how many pages" but "does this shape communicate the business", and that needs judgement.
What your structure currently says about your business, where it breaks down, and what we'd restructure first — in priority order, in plain language. Usually within a few working days.
The full list of what gets examined, published up front. If you'd rather take this and audit your own site with it, that's a perfectly good outcome — it's all here, nothing is held back for people who submit.
Free. A domain and an email — nothing else. We don't contact your site when you submit this; a person opens it later and works through the list above.
Visibility asks whether machines can reach and read your pages. X-Ray asks whether the pages are arranged in a way that makes sense — to a person and to a crawler working out what matters. A site can pass every technical visibility check and still be structured so badly that nothing important gets found. They're sequential questions, and plenty of people want both.
Internal linking and hierarchy are how you tell a search engine which of your pages matter, without saying it out loud. A page nothing links to is a page you've implicitly told everyone is unimportant. Three near-identical service pages split the signal between them instead of concentrating it. These are decisions most sites make by accident.
The mechanical part — listing pages, following links, finding orphans — is exactly the kind of thing software does well, and one day some of it will. The part that produces the actual value is judging whether the shape matches the business, which needs someone who understands what you sell. Starting with the manual version means the eventual automated one gets built around findings that proved useful, rather than whatever was easiest to measure.
Nothing touches your site at the moment you press the button. No requests to your server, no queued job, no automated retrieval. Your domain is written down and a person opens it later.
It isn't a full technical SEO audit, a keyword or ranking report, a backlink analysis, a performance report, or a UX/design critique. It's a structural review. If the honest answer is that your structure is fine and your problem is somewhere else, we'll say that.
No. Nothing runs against your site when you submit the form. A person at LATYNEX works through your site and the published checklist by hand and writes up what they found. We say that plainly because plenty of tools describe the same thing as an instant report and it isn't one.
Visibility asks whether machines can reach, read and understand your pages — robots, crawlers, schema, rendered HTML. X-Ray asks whether your pages are arranged sensibly — hierarchy, internal links, orphans, duplicate paths, language structure. Different questions, and it's common to want both. You can request them separately.
Usually within a few working days. We'd rather say that than promise a fixed turnaround we might miss — a person does this around other work.
Yes. No card, no upsell gate, no paid tier hidden behind it. These are free because we want to learn which reviews people actually want before building anything more automated.
No, though the findings differ. A large site usually has orphans, duplication and hierarchy drift. A small site more often has the opposite problem — everything one click from everything else, so nothing signals as more important than anything else. Both are structural, both are fixable.
No. Everything on the checklist is visible from the outside. We don't ask for logins, admin access, Search Console or analytics — and you shouldn't hand those over for a free review.
A written review by email: how your site is currently structured, where that structure works against you, and a prioritised list of what we'd change first. Plain language, not raw output.
The request goes to the same place every other LATYNEX enquiry goes, and a human reads it. Your email is used to send the findings. No drip sequence, no list you're quietly added to.